Nancy Guthrie is still missing, and somehow that fact keeps getting buried under the noise of everyone showing up to be seen caring about it.
There is something deeply broken about watching people turn a missing woman’s memorial into a set piece, the streamers, the folding chairs, the phones aimed outward like antennae searching for signal, while managing to believe, with total sincerity, that the camera itself is a form of rescue. That standing near grief long enough is the same as doing something about it. That proximity is purpose, if you just hold the shot steady.
A memorial is supposed to be a place where grief can breathe.
Where you stop for a moment and remember the person, leave flowers, leave a sign, leave love, and then have enough respect to leave the family and the neighborhood with some dignity still intact. It is not supposed to become a backdrop for recurring content. It is not supposed to be the place where someone aims a camera at loss and waits for viewers to mistake that stillness for investigation.
Pointing a camera at a memorial for hours does not find Nancy. It does not build a timeline, locate witnesses, walk washes, search trails, knock on appropriate doors, or put pressure on the right people. What it does is create an audience, and no matter how many times that gets dressed up as awareness, an audience is not a search party. An audience is just people watching, which is its own thing entirely, and it should not get to borrow the moral weight of the other.
I understand the urge to feel useful, I do, genuinely. Missing person cases get inside people’s heads because the open wound of the unanswered is unbearable, and so you start thinking that maybe if you watch closely enough, post enough, stay near the scene long enough, something will break loose. But there is a small and dangerous lie living inside that feeling, and it is the lie that confuses standing near pain with carrying it with care. Sometimes you are not helping. Sometimes you are just in the way with better lighting and a Temu tripod, purchased by your gullible viewers via Super Chats.
Now the defense being offered is that everyone is standing on a road easement, so it is legal, so there is nothing to discuss, and anyone who questions it must hate awareness or hate Nancy or be secretly working to suppress the truth. But that is not an argument. That is someone learning one legal phrase and trying to use it like a master key for someone else’s neighborhood, someone else’s street, someone else’s worst year. An easement is a limited right to use land for a specific purpose. A road exists for travel, for access, for utilities and emergency response and the basic function of a neighborhood being a neighborhood. It does not exist so that content creators can treat a residential street like a campsite, a protest pit, a livestream studio, and a parking lot all at once, and then get confused when the public and deputies object.
Being legally adjacent to a road does not mean you get to colonize the neighborhood with cameras and call everyone else corrupt for noticing you did it.
Which brings us to the latest move, where Criminal Network, aka Alex Zabel, reposted a case screenshot and used it to attack Deputy Haines and Sheriff Nanos, claiming the document proves the deputy is close friends with the sheriff because their names appear together in a civil case. A case caption listing multiple defendants does not prove friendship. It does not prove a conspiracy. It does not prove that a deputy responding to a neighborhood complaint is secretly acting on personal loyalty rather than, say, doing his job. It proves names are listed on a court page, and that is genuinely it, and the distance between that fact and the conclusion being drawn is not investigative rigor. It is someone treating public records like tarot cards and then screaming corruption when the reading does not hold up.
Grab a screenshot. Invent the emotional conclusion. Threaten more FOIA requests. Act righteous. That is the whole loop, and it keeps spinning because their audience raised from the pits of a potato patch, cannot tell the difference between momentum and meaning.
The part that gets overlooked in all of this is that residents have rights too. Neighbors have the right to live on their street without becoming unpaid extras in someone else’s livestream, to call law enforcement when people are lingering in a way that feels unsafe or wrong, to be taken seriously when they say that what is happening outside their homes does not feel like care. It feels like extraction. You do not get to dismiss every complaint as fabricated just because the complaint is inconvenient to your content schedule, because that is not advocacy. That is just making yourself immune to accountability and calling it a civil rights stance.
And then there is the graduation party comparison, which keeps limping back into the conversation as though repetition is some kind of CPR for a bad analogy. A graduation party is a temporary family event where people park, hug, eat, take pictures, celebrate a kid, and then go home, because the point of the event is the kid, not the neighborhood, not the street, not the potential for drama. They are not pulling strangers into the area day after day. They are not building a channel around a family’s worst nightmare or using a missing woman’s name as moral armor for behavior that would feel genuinely creepy if it were happening outside their own front door. A graduation party is life happening. This other thing is grief being farmed, and yes, that sounds harsh, but maybe it should, because we have apparently spent so long watching tragedy become content that we forgot to feel the disgust that should be automatic when we see it.
If you actually want to help find Nancy, then do something that has a real chance of helping. Share verified information. Keep the timeline clean from your speculation and nonsense. Interview people respectfully in public places. Search areas where it makes sense. Put pressure on the parts of the system that genuinely need pressure. Use whatever platform you have to point people toward facts, not toward your own YouTube thumbnail where your face is bigger than the victim’s.
But stop calling a camera pointed at flowers an investigation. Stop pretending a road easement turns a neighborhood into a personal studio. Stop pretending every deputy who tells someone to move is running cover for a conspiracy. Stop pretending a court caption is proof of friendship or corruption or some grand plot against people who cannot understand that rights come with limits, and communities come with actual human beings attached.
Nancy Guthrie is still missing, and that should matter more than the content being squeezed out of her absence.
Her family deserves better. Her neighbors deserve better. And Nancy deserves to be searched for, not used as scenery by people who found a memorial and mistook it for a microphone, a thumbnail, and a self serving way to grow their channels and cash in on super chats.
About the Author
